Sunday, December 7, 2008

Response to terror: Are mass protests and online petitions enough?

The public response to the Mumbai "mayhem" has been typical. We held demonstrations, burnt effigies of politicians, shouted slogans against them and went home. On the Internet we wrote blogs demanding answers from the government, floated public petitions and forwarded angry emails. Haven't we always done this? How well has it served us so far? This is just a knee-jerk response, which is going to fade out, and eventually the "chalta hai" attitude is going to take over. This may sound pessimistic but this is the way it has always been. The question we need to ask ourselves is how else are we going to deal with this? We can't change the hand we are dealt; all we can do is make the most of it.

Over the past few years the Indian economy has been vibrant and robust. This is heartening not only because the GDP growth rate has been very healthy but more importantly because most of this growth has been fueled by the growing middle-class. The government hasn't done anything out of the ordinary as far as policies are concerned; all they have done is not interfere with the corporate world. The people of India have taken it upon themselves to drive the economy. One can only hope that this attitude that has driven the economy drives the politics as well. As the middle-class grows accountability should spread from the corporate world into governance.

We blame the politicians for not being responsive but didn't we always know that these incompetent, irresponsible buffoons aren't going to do anything? Don't we always vote for the candidate who we think can do the least damage? It's like choosing the tallest among the seven dwarfs. We all know that the current crop of politicians is lame, so it is basically up to us to act. Writing letters or submitting petitions to bureaucrats and elected officials hasn't got us the desired result thus far and it is very unlikely that it ever will. The underlying assumption with this modus operandi is that the readers actually care, but we have ample proof that this may not necessarily be the case. Even if some of them do care, given the size of the government and the number of contradicting functions it has to carry out, by the time they get something accomplished it might be too late.

Moving forward the first thing we need to do is be responsible voters and make sure that we elect candidates who can do the least harm. After the parliament attacks we thought that the then-incumbent home minister was bad but his successor epitomized incompetence. We should also start cooperative movements that would provide a support system in the event of a crisis. As a friend pointed out "Teevra Chaukas" is the motto of the Corps of Signals of the Indian Army. It should not be restricted to just them but it should be the motto of every citizen. If all of us are socially aware and vigilant our vast population can be an asset and not a liability. One of the reasons why cooperative movements have succeeded in the past is that they have minimum government involvement and dependency. If we are to pull through such crises self-reliance, cooperation, social and religious tolerance is of paramount importance.

Please don't get me wrong; I am not trying to discourage mass demonstrations or online petitions. They serve the purpose of raising public awareness and attempt at inculcating accountability in the government. All I am saying is that we must also explore an alternative path which is more proactive and therefore more likely to yield the desired results.

Note: These are the views of a novice trying to come to terms with all that has happened. Please take them with a pinch of salt. Comments and opinions are very welcome.

2 comments:

  1. Well it’s easy to blame the citizens of India for not choosing their leaders wisely but out of all the leaders to choose who all are competent. None of today’s election candidates are smart enough to lead our country except for a few distinguished old leaders that are supposed to enjoy retirement today. The people who stand for elections are the one that have muscle power and it’s a must in today’s India’s world to survive in politics. Everyone fights for their own survival in the world using their own skills or means of livelihood so the same for these politicians. To maintain their muscle power they need money power which comes from the tax payers pocket and it’s a viscous circle. I would like to ask this blogger a highly educated engineer what is he doing to change the face of politics? Why cannot he stand for elections and be a competent candidate. The answer would be a big definite NO because they are concerned for their own survival. Definitely it applies to all the educated competent candidates who are smart to make money and enjoy life and be least concerned of the society. Dr, Kalam has repeatedly advised IIM and IIT students to join politics and change the face of this country but it has fallen on deaf ears as they look at the big bucks. As a result the viscous circle of politics is hereditary or is run by those who know the business and the real support also comes from outside the country who is our enemies. An example is 6 years ago 5 IIM students declined big offers from reputed companies to join politics and even floated a party. Three years later their respective families had those student funeral services. It’s the survival of the fittest in today’s society and nothing can be done unless we are not so concerned about ourselves but the country. This applies to all Indians not just politicians, bloggers and journalist. It’s easy to blame and analyze but action speaks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Firstly, thanks for you comment and thanks also for calling me a "highly educated engineer". I always thought that I was just washing hands in flowing Ganges :-).

    This post isn't commenting on the voting choice of us Indians. In fact it suggests that we should choose the candidate who can do the least possible damage, implying that there is a dearth of leadership in the country. It also does not expect 1, 10 or even 100 people to step up and reform the country's politics.

    However, this post is commenting on the manner in which we have expressed our disappointment. It is trying to suggest that just filing online petitions and carrying out mass protests should not satisfy us. Since we know that our country lacks leadership, we must fill that void by stepping forward as a society and helping each other out. This not something new to us, Asha For Education has shown us that it is possible to achieve a lot by minimizing government intervention.

    Libertarians believe in minimizing our dependency on the government, this post in a way, is subscribing to that view.

    ReplyDelete